After my playdate from hell, I've been thinking a lot about different parenting styles. It's seems almost a paradox, how people parent. Here's what I've noticed:
Most people in America (I'll just call them the mainstreamers) tend to ignore their children when they are babies and then overparent them when they are children. Mainstreamers tend to give birth medicated, not hold their babies very much, sleep apart from them, put them in strollers, formula feed, carry them in carseats, set them down for naps, and maybe even let them cry it out. They're ignoring their little baby's needs when they need it most. But then, when baby grows up a little, this is when the mainstreamers start to overparent. They start to hover. They turn into helicopter parents (click here for a good article on the growing backlash against helicopter parenting). They start to do everything for their child because they don't trust that their child can do it for themselves.
Now, there is another subset of American parents that does things a little differently. I'll call them instinctual parents. Instinctual parents give birth naturally, breastfeed, co-sleep, wear their babies, and comfort their babies when they cry. Just things that come naturally, you know? Then, when their babies grow a little older, instinctual parents tend to back off a bit. They let their children explore the world. They let their children work out their differences on their own. They let their children play and figure out things on their own.
Both of these parenting styles are paradoxical, the latter just feels a more comfortable for me and not at all ironic in its paradox.
I don't ever want to tell my children that they can't do something. I don't want other people to tell them that they can't do something. You can't use a knife. You're too little. You shouldn't climb up that. It's too high. You shouldn't run with scissors. You might hurt yourself. I want them to believe in themselves and in their abilities. They know what they can and cannot do better than I ever will. They know their abilities. They know their limits. I don't have to tell them. I don't want to tell them. I don't care if they use knives, run with scissors, or climb things that are too high. (Here is a picture of my daughter climbing a very tall tree when she was four. She knew she could do it because nobody never told her that she couldn't.)
Instinctual parenting is like putting money in the bank. Sure, it might seem like more work in the beginning, but babies who are parented this way become much more independent and secure as children (thus, the natural inclination to let them do things on their own). They know that you WILL be there to meet their needs when and if they need you. They have faith in you. I remember my mother-in-law telling us how her kids' kindergarten teacher would say, "You must have held your children a lot when they were babies because they are less needy than the other kids now." The teacher could tell the difference, apparently.
There is a lot of value to instinctual parenting. Let's listen to those instincts a little bit more instead of just doing what everybody else seems to be doing.


7 comments:
I am much more of an instinctual person than mainstream but let me tell you it gets harder as they get older! My daughter is 14. Driving age in my state is permit at 16 and licensed only after 6 months of logged driving practice and passing the driving test. I started letting my daughter drive in parking lots a little while ago. I figured if we started early, she's be less stressed and by the time she was old enough for her permit, it would be easy. She told a few of her friends and I could not believe the comments I got from parents! They couldn't believe I'd actually let her drive around empty parking lots more than once. I replied that at least she'd be able to drive me to the hospital in case of an emergency ;)
I've also let my son set a fire in the backyard pit.
Keep fighting the good fight.
PS- I came at Tina's recommendation.
Mim - Yes, I agree, it does tend to get harder as they get older. Some of my other friends said this as well. Sounds like you're doing alright though. :)
Hey Allison,
Mainly wanted to say that I really like your blog. It's funny and smart. I guess that means you are...but since I don't know you it felt more suitable to compliment your blog.
Anyway, I like the idea of just letting kids try things without interfering and not telling them they can't do stuff...but I also feel like I am supposed to keep them safe too, like from really really dangerous stuff. I guess my thing is trying to find the line between what would truly hurt them and what would just give them a minor flesh wound, and chill. Is it better just to make sure my 2 year old doesn't have access to sharp knives and scissors so that I don't tell her no? Sorry if this sounds really dumb.
Jennifer R - Thanks. Yes, two is kind of a tricky age because they might want to do some things that they aren't quite ready for. With my kids, I've noticed that they will usually back off if they don't think they're ready for it (like climbing up a play structure or something like that). Other kids might not be that way. It is a tricky line though, between keeping them safe and keeping up with their autonomy and free will. I think you answered your own question with if you don't want them to have access to sharp knives, just don't have them around. Thanks again for the compliments on the blog!
I have tried my best to keep my personal opinions to myself, but I have a question/scenerio for you to ponder: what happens IF when your children become adults and you have provided them with all of the tools to think for themselves and to make their own choices that they "choose" to live their lives with different views than your own (such as public schools, processed foods, rules, ect.). Are you going to be okay with that? I hope so, otherwise your parenting would be a walking contridiction.
I have a question and like Jennifer, sorry if this is dumb. What would your response be to an almost 1 year old who likes to suck on plugged-in electrical cords (like the laptop power cord or the iphone cord or the jillion other cords in our house?) Yes, I should keep them all out of his reach, and mostly they are, but he will unplug things just to suck on the end of the cord. I think he likes the jolt (that I know he gets because I sucked on one once). I love the idea of unconditional parenting and it seems intuitive to me (like no chemicals and grassfed and babywearing and breastfeeding and all the other crunchy things we do) but I have been thinking all day and I don't know the answer to tell him not to do that without saying "No, you can't". The best I've come up with is "Mama is uncomfortable with the idea of BBQ baby".
(Currently I take the cord away and try to do something else that will satisfy his curiosity. Sometimes he cries, sometimes he goes with the flow).
Also - do you ever say No? I reserve No for times when he is in Danger so hopefully he has a gut reaction to NO that says "stop what you are doing".
I have about 10,000 other questions for you, but I'll try to space them out. You are the first person I'm able to question who has done all the things we try to do... so I may fly to you someday, haha.
Rachael - Great questions. Babies and toddlers are relatively easy to "discipline" (I'm using quotes here because I don't really like the word "discipline" in conjunction with "children") because it's all about distraction. So, if Peace was sucking on an electrical cord, I would just take it away from here and find her something else to play with. Possibly saying something like, "Look, here's a ball!" And, like you said, the best thing to do is to set things up so that they can avoid things like that in the first place and create a world where the can learn and explore and stuff like that (yeah, yeah, I know this all sounds better on paper than it does in real life).
Plus, there is also the fact that one year olds don't really understand the word No. I think I read something somewhere once (sorry I can't think of a source better than that) that said it isn't until age (I don't know) 3 or 4 or maybe even older where they can really have a concept of what it means.
For example, if I were to tell you, "Don't think of a pink elephant. Don't think of a pink elephant. Don't think of a pink elephant." What are you thinking of? (Note: You are supposed to say, "A pink elephant" for my example here to work.) So, instead of say "No" or "Don't do that" to your child, the ideal thing would be to give them an alternative, which will give them something to focus on instead of what you DON'T want them to do.
I consciously try to avoid saying the word no as much as possible, even in dangerous situations. I think that Dr. Sears wrote something about when trying to get their attention in a dangerous situation, instead of saying No!, say something more descriptive instead, like Hot! or Ouch!
Like, say you don't want your kid to go into the street, and you start yelling at them, "No! Don't go into the street!" Well, if they are a young toddler, chances are they will get a kick out of seeing the way you react and want to do it again just to get a reaction out of you. But if you react more calmly, and just get down on their level, and say something like, "Streets are for cars. Sidewalks are for you." Then, they might get a better idea of what you expect out of them.
Again, don't think I'm some expert or something because I'm able to answer some of your questions in a somewhat cohesive manner. There are times when I know what I *should* be doing, and what I end up doing are quite different.
Oh, and I wanted to tell you about The Daily Groove! This is the best thing, you'll see. It's just little inspirational articles about parenting that you can have sent to your e-mail every day. They are wonderful, and a great resource for parents.
http://www.enjoyparenting.com/dailygroove
Post a Comment